DÍVIDA PÚBLICA E CRESCIMENTO ECONÔMICO NO BRASIL
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55532/1806-8944.2020.108Palabras clave:
causalidade de Granger, VEC, ARDL, dívida do governo, crescimento econômicoResumen
Neste estudo fornecemos novas evidências sobre a relação entre a dívida pública e o crescimento econômico no Brasil. Foram aplicados testes de causalidade de Granger, em análises multivariadas e bivariadas usando Vetor de Correção de Erros (VEC) e modelos Autorregressivos de Defasagens Distribuídas (ARDL). Utilizaram-se dados mensais entre janeiro de 1998 a novembro de 2019. Considerou-se a interação entre outras variáveis como juros, inflação, câmbio, Índice de Emerging Market Bond Index Plus (Embi +) e superávit primário. As conclusões são: Dívida e crescimento do PIB têm uma relação de causalidade de Granger bidirecional. A dívida pode melhorar o crescimento no curto prazo e se tornar prejudicial no longo prazo. A taxa de crescimento do PIB sempre reduz a dívida, tanto no curto quanto no longo prazo. A dinâmica entre dívida e crescimento no longo prazo é influenciada pela interação com a taxa de inflação, a taxa de câmbio e Embi+.
Citas
Afonso, A. (2008). “Ricardian Fiscal Regimes in the European Union”, Empirica, 35 (3), 313–334.
Afonso, A., and J. Alves. 2015. “The Role of Government Debt in Economic Growth.” Hacienda Publica Espanola / Review of Public Economics, IEF 215(4): 9–26. https://ideas.repec.org/a/hpe/journl/y2015v215i4p9-26.html.
———. 2016. “Reconsidering Wagner’s Law: Evidence from the Functions of the Government.” Applied Economics Letters 24 (5): 346–50. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2758664.
Afonso, A., and J. T. Jalles. 2013. “Growth and Productivity: The Role of Government Debt.” International Review of Economics and Finance 25: 384–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2012.07.004.
———. 2014. “Causality for the Government Budget and Economic Growth.” SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2429909.
Afonso, A., and Luís Martins. 2016. Monetary Developments and Expansionary Fiscal Consolidations: Evidence from the EMU. International Journal of Finance and Economics. Vol. 21. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.1544.
Brunnermeier, Markus K., Luis Garicano, Philip R. Lane, Marco Pagano, Ricardo Reis, Tano Santos, David Thesmar, Stijn Van Nieuwerburgh, and Dimitri Vayanos. 2016. “The Sovereign-Bank Diabolic Loop and Esbies.” American Economic Review 106 (5): 508–12. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.p20161107.
Butts, Hector C. 2009. “Short Term External Debt and Economic Growth - Granger Causality: Evidence from Latin America and the Caribbean.” Review of Black Political Economy 36 (2): 93–111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12114-009-9041-7.
Cherif, Reda, and Fuad Hasanov. 2018. “Public Debt Dynamics: The Effects of Austerity, Inflation, and Growth Shocks.” Empirical Economics 54 (3): 1087–1105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-017-1260-3.
Égert, Balázs. 2015. “Public Debt, Economic Growth and Nonlinear Effects: Myth or Reality?” Journal of Macroeconomics 43: 226–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmacro.2014.11.006.
Elliot, Graham, Thomas J. Rothenberg, and James H. Stock. 1996. “Efficient Tests for an Autoregressive Unit Root.” Econometrica 64 (4): 813–36. https://doi.org/10.2307/2171846.
Enders, W. 2005. Applied Econometric Time Series. 2nd ed. Nova York: International Edition – Wiley,: Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics.
Engle, Robert F, and C W J Granger. 1987. “Co-Integration and Error Correction : Representation , Estimation , and Testing Published by : The Econometric Society Stable URL : Http://Www.Jstor.Com/Stable/1913236 REFERENCES Linked References Are Available on JSTOR for This Article : Reference # Refe” 55 (2): 251–76.
Ewing, Bradley T. 2003. “The Response of the Default Risk Premium to Macroeconomic Shocks.” Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance 43 (2): 261–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1062-9769(02)00147-3.
Gadelha, Sérgio Ricardo de Brito. 2011. “Causalidade Temporal Entre Receita e Despesa Governamentais.” Análise Econômica, Porto Alegre 26 (56): 109–30. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004.
Gadelha, Sérgio Ricardo de Brito, and José Angelo Divino. 2008. “Dominância Fiscal Ou Dominância Monetária No Brasil? Uma Análise de Causalidade.” Economia Aplicada, São Paulo 12 (4): 659–75. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1413-80502008000400006.
———. 2013. “Uma Análise Da Ciclicidade Da Política Fiscal Brasileira.” Estudos Economicos 43 (4): 711–43. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-41612013000400004.
Gómez-Puig, Marta, and Simón Sosvilla-Rivero. 2015. “The Causal Relationship between Debt and Growth in EMU Countries.” Journal of Policy Modeling 37 (6): 974–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2015.09.004.
Johansen, Søren. 2002. “A Small Sample Correction for the Test of Cointegrating Rank in the Vector Autoregressive Model.” Econometrica 70 (5): 1929–61. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0262.00358.
Johansen, Søren, and Katarina Juselius. 1990. “Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Inference on Cointegration — With Applications To the Demand for Money.” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 52 (2): 169–210. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0084.1990.mp52002003.x.
Johansen, Søren, Rocco Mosconi, and Bent Nielsen. 2000. “Cointegration Analysis in the Presence of Structural Breaks in the Deterministic Trend.” The Econometrics Journal 3 (2): 216–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/1368-423x.00047.
Koop, Gary, M. Hashem Pesaran, and Simon M. Potter. 1996. “Impulse Response Analysis in Nonlinear Multivariate Models.” Journal of Econometrics 74 (1): 119–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(95)01753-4.
Lai, Sue-Ling, Le-Huyen Trang, and Kuo-Cheng Kuo. 2015. “Causal Relationship among Debt, GDP and Inflation in France.” International Journal of Intelligent Technologies and Applied Statistics 8 (3): 205–24. https://doi.org/10.6148/IJITAS.2015.0803.02.
Lanne, Markku, Helmut Lütkepohl, and Pentti Saikkonen. 2002. “Comparison of Unit Root Tests for Time Series with Level Shifts.” Journal of Time Series Analysis 23 (6): 667–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9892.00285.
Lutkenpohl, H. 1991. Introduction to Multiple Time Series Analysis. Berlin: Springer.
Maddala, G S, and In-moo Kim. 2004. Unit Roots, Cointegration, and Structural Change.
Matheson, Troy, and Joana Pereira. 2016. “Fiscal Multipliers for Brazil.” IMF Working Papers. Vol. 16. https://doi.org/10.5089/9781484307892.001.
Ng, Serena, and Pierre Perron. 2001. “Lag Length Selection and the Construction of Unit Root Tests with Good Size and Power.” Econometrica 69 (6): 1519–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0262.00256.
Pastore, Affonso Celso, Edmar Bacha, João Victor Issler, Marcelle Chauvet, Marco Bonomo, Paulo Picchetti, Fernando Veloso, and Vagner Ardeo. 2020. “Economic Cycle Dating Committee - June 2020.” https://portalibre.fgv.br/sites/default/files/2020-06/brazilian-economic-cycle-dating-committee-announcement-on-06_29_2020-1.pdf.
Pesaran, H. Hashem, and Yongcheol Shin. 1998. “Generalized Impulse Response Analysis in Linear Multivariate Models.” Economics Letters 58 (1): 17–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0165-1765(98)00214-6.
Reinhart, Carment M., and Kenneth S. Rogoff. 2010. “Growth in a Time of Debt.” National Bureau of Economic Reserarch. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004.
Rodrigues, Rodrigo Vilela, and Erly Cardoso Teixeira. 2013. “Gastos Públicos e Crescimento Econômico No Brasil Da Segunda Metade Do Século XX: Uma Abordagem Do Teste de Causalidade de Granger.” Revista Políticas Públicas, São Luís 17 (1): 115–25. https://doi.org/10.18764/2178-2865.v17n1p115-125.
Saikkonen, Pentti, and Helmut Lütkepohl. 2002. “Testing for a Unit Root in a Time Series With a Level Shift at Unknown Time.” Econometric Theory 18 (2): 313–48. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266466602182053.
Vogelsang, T., and Pierre Perron. 1998. “Additional Tests for a Unit Root Allowing for a Break in the Trend Function at an Unknown Time.” International Economic Review 39 (4): 1073–1100. url: https://www.jstor.org/stable/2527353.
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Los artículos se pueden copiar, ya que cotqué el origen.
