ELECTRONIC PRICE AND TRADING: DETERMINANT FACTORS IN THE SEARCH OF THE LOWEST PRICE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55532/1806-8944.2020.93Keywords:
Electronic bidding, Publics purchases, Bid, NegotiationAbstract
This study treats about an analysis of the electronic bidding in face of the expansion of its use
in government procurement, which according to the Ministry of Economy has promoted in
recent years more practicality, isonomy, transparency, competitiveness, efficiency and
economy. In this scenario, we analyzed the main elements that make up the bidding process,
highlighting the effects of negotiations on the bids and the prices reached. The study selected
eight factors, estimated price, quantity of bidders, quantity demanded, initial bid, number of
bids, type of trading, negotiation and insistence on negotiation. A sample was separated from
the eight most bidded objects according to the Ministry of Economy, where data were collected
from 1271 bids from 2018. A multiple regression was performed in Excel, placing as
independent variables the cited elements and as dependent variable the lowest price reached .
Focusing on the trading characteristic of the electronic bidding, an analysis of the incidence of
negotiations in public sessions and a general comparison of prices, including all the objects
analyzed in the study, was also performed. The results showed that the most relevant factors in
the trading results are the number of participants and the estimated price, while trading was not
relevant and common when prices were high. However, there was a gain in the overall analysis
with price reductions even if already below the estimated. Given this, the study shows that
competitiveness and robust price research are crucial for better results and negotiation, although
not decisive, provides small gains in public sector bids.
References
ESTATÍSTICAS ECONÔMICAS. PIB cresce 1,1% em 2018 e fecha ano em R$6,8 trilhões. Agência IBGE Notícias, 2019. Disponível em: <https://agenciadenoticias.ibge.gov.br/agencia-sala-de-imprensa/2013-agencia-de-noticias/releases/23886-pib-cresce-1-1-em-2018-e-fecha-ano-em-r-6-8-trilhoes>. Acesso em: 01 set. 2019.
FERNANDES, J. U. J. Sistema de registro de preços e pregão presencial e eletrônico. 5ª. ed. Belo Horizonte: Editora Fórum. 2013. 602 p.
INSTITUTO DE PESQUISA ECONÔMICA APLICADA. Programas visam inserir micro e pequenas empresas nas compras governamentais, 2018. Disponível em:
<http://www.ipea.gov.br/portal/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=34435> . Acessoem: 01 set. 2019.
KLEMPERER, P. Auctions: theory and practice. Princeton University Press, 2004.
MCAFEE, R.P. & MCMILLAN, J. Auctions and bidding. Journal of Economic Literature. v. 25, n. 2, p. 699-738, jun.1987.
MCCLAVE, J. T.; BENSON, P. G. e SINCICH, T. Estatística para Administração e Economia, 10ª ed. São Paulo: Ed. Pearson Prentice Hall, 2009.
MINISTÉRIO DA ECONOMIA. Bem-vindo ao painel de Preços, 2017. Disponível em: <http://paineldeprecos.planejamento.gov.br/>. Acesso em: 10 set. 2019.
______. Pregão eletrônico reduz custos das compras do governo, 2015. Disponível em: <http://www.planejamento.gov.br/assuntos/logistica-e-tecnologia-da-informacao/noticias/pregao-eletronico-reduz-custos-das-compras-do>. Acesso em: 02 out. 2019.
MONTEIRO, V. Licitação na modalidade pregão: Lei 10.520, de 17 de julho de 2002. 2ª. ed. São Paulo: Malheiros, 2010. 286 p.
NIEBUHR, J. M. Licitação Pública e Contrato Administrativo. 1ª. ed. Curitiba: Editora Zênite, out. 2008. 632 p.
______. Pregão presencial e eletrônico. 7ª. ed. Belo Horizonte: Editora Fórum, out. 2015. 416 p.
NUNES, R. A. M.; JULIANI, L. I.; SILVEIRA, J. S. T.O impacto dos gastos governamentais, da taxa de juros e da taxa de câmbio sobre a produção agregada brasileira. Revista Eumednet, Observatório de La EconomíaLatinoamericana, Erechim – RS, fev, 2016. Disponível em <http://www.eumed.net/cursecon/ecolat/br/16/juros.html>. Acesso em 08 out. 2019.
TRIBUNAL DE CONTAS DA UNIÃO. Acórdão 2166/2014. Relator: Augusto Sherman, Órgão Julgador: Plenário, julgamento: 20/08/2014. Disponível em: <https://www.lexml.gov.br/urn/urn:lex:br:tribunal.contas.uniao;plenario:acordao:2014-08-20;2166>. Acesso em: 12 out. 2019
______. Acórdão 620/2014. Relator: Valmir Campelo, Órgão Julgador: Plenário, julgamento: 19/03/2014. Disponível em: <https://pesquisa.apps.tcu.gov.br/#/documento/acordao-completo/*/KEY%253AACORDAO-COMPLETO-1304939/DTRELEVANCIA%2520desc/0/sinonimos%253Dfalse>. Acesso em: 12 out. 2019
______. Acórdão 694/2014. Relator: Valmir Campelo, Órgão Julgador: Plenário, julgamento: 26/03/2014. Disponível em: <https://pesquisa.apps.tcu.gov.br/#/documento/acordao-completo/*/KEY%253AACORDAO-COMPLETO-1305037/DTRELEVANCIA%2520desc/0/sinonimos%253Dfalse>. Acesso em: 12 out. 2019
VAZ, L. Golpe no pregão eletrônico. Revista Istoé, São Paulo, edição n. 2168. jun. 2011. Disponível em: <https://istoe.com.br/139247_GOLPE+NO+PREGAO+ELETRONICO/>, 2016. Acesso em: 10 set. de 2019.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The articles can be copied, since quoted the source.