Bailout expectations and moral hazard in debt by subnational governments: empirical evidence from Brazil

Authors

  • Carlos Reis Hertie School

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55532/1806-8944.2020.53

Keywords:

Default, Socorros Financeiros Governamentais, Endividamento dos Estados, Restrição Orçamentária, Gastos Públicos

Abstract

The following article sheds light on the negative externalities created by the expectation that the federal government may bail out subnational governments in cases of fiscal insolvency and debt default. According to the literature on soft budget constraints, bailout expectations increase the willingness of financial intermediaries to lend for subnational governments. As a result of an expansion of borrowing possibilities, subnational governments over-borrow, reduce the allocation of own resources to investments and increase current expenditures. 

In order to empirically test these hypotheses, this article explores the substantial increase in borrowing possibilities for Brazilian states after 2007. In the aftermath of the financial crisis, the federal government eased the restrictions on subnational government borrowing as part of a fiscal policy to boost economic growth. As a result, subnational governments over-borrowed. Moreover, the Brazilian context is very appropriate for testing these hypotheses, since the recent history of intergovernmental relations demonstrates that the federal government repeatedly failed in sticking to a no-bailout commitment.

By employing a dynamic panel model, it was estimated that an expansion of credit supply by R$ 1 million is correlated with a reduction in investments with own resources by R$ 570 thousand. Moreover, the findings indicate that a reduction of investments with own resources by R$ 1 million is correlated with an increase of current expenditures by R$ 800 thousand. Therefore, an expansion of credit supply by R$ 1 million is correlated with an increase of current expenditures by R$ 460 thousand.

This article concludes that, in the context of soft budget constraints, financial intermediaries are more willing to lend to subnational governments. The expansion of borrowing possibilities, in turn, encourages subnational governments to over-borrow, reducing the allocation of own resources to investments and increasing current expenditures.

References

Referência bibliográfica

Arellano,M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations, Review of Economic Studies, 58, 277-297.

Besfamille, M., & Lockwood, B. (2008). Bailouts in federations: Is a hard budget constraint always best? International Economic Review, 49(2), 577–593. https://doi.org/10.111/j.1468-2354.2008.00490.x

Blöchliger, H., & Kantorowicz, J. (2015). Fiscal constitutions : An empirical assessment. OECD Economics Department Working Paper, 1248.

Crivelli, E. (2011). Subnational fiscal behavior under the expectation of federal bailouts. Journal of Economic Policy Reform, 14(1), 41–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/17487870.2011.543760

Fink, A., & Stratmann, T. (2011). Institutionalized Bailouts and Fiscal Policy: Consequences of Soft Budget Constraints. Kyklos, 64(3), 366–395. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6435.2011.00511.x

Haan, J., Sturm, J. E., & Sikken, B. J. (2007). Government capital formation: Explaining the decline. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 132(1), 55–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02707902

International Monetary Fund. Fiscal Affairs Dept. (2019). Brazil: Technical Assistance Report - Strengthening the Framework for Subnational Borrowing, 2019. Retrieved from https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/CR/Issues/2019/09/19/Brazil-Technical-Assistance-Report-Strengthening-the-Framework-for-Subnational-Borrowing-48693

Kohlscheen, E. (2008). Debt bailouts and constitutions. Economic Inquiry, 46(3), 480–492. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7295.2007.00102.x

Kornai, J., Maskin, E., & Roland, G. (2003). Understanding the Soft Budget Constraint. Journal of Economic Literature, 41 (4), 1095-1136.

Lei Complementar no 101 de 2000. Estabelece normas de finanças públicas voltadas para a responsabilidade na gestão fiscal e dá outras providências. Brasil. Retrieved from: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/lcp/lcp101.htm

Lei Complementar no 148 de 2014. Altera a Lei Complementar no 101, de 4 de maio de 2000, que estabelece normas de finanças públicas voltadas para a responsabilidade na gestão fiscal; dispõe sobre critérios de indexação dos contratos de refinanciamento da dívida celebrados entre a União, Estados, o Distrito Federal e Municípios; e dá outras providências. Retrieved from: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/LEIS/LCP/Lcp148.htm

Lei Complementar no 156 de 2016. Estabelece o Plano de Auxílio aos Estados e ao Distrito Federal e medidas de estímulo ao reequilíbrio fiscal; e altera a Lei Complementar no 148, de 25 de novembro de 2014, a Lei no 9.496, de 11 de setembro de 1997, a Medida Provisória no 2.192-70, de 24 de agosto de 2001, a Lei no 8.727, de 5 de novembro de 1993, e a Lei Complementar no 101, de 4 de maio de 2000. Retrieved from: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/LEIS/LCP/Lcp156.htm

Orair, R. (2016). Investimento Público no Brasil: trajetória e relações com o regime fiscal. (Working paper n° 2215). Brasília: IPEA. Retrieved from http://repositorio.ipea.gov.br/bitstream/11058/6873/1/TD_2215.PDF

Piancastelli, M., & Boueri, R. (2008). Dívida dos estados 10 anos depois. (Working paper n° 1366). Brasília: IPEA. Retrieved from http://www.ipea.gov.br/portal/index.php?option=com_contentview=article&id=5132

Qian, Y. (1995). Federalism and the Soft Budget Constraint. American Economic Review, 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.6.3.79

Rodden, J., Bordignon, M., von Hagen, J., Kneebone, R., Rattsø, J., Samuels, D., … Wildasin, D. (2005). And the last shall be first: Federalism and soft budget Constraints in Germany , 1–39.

Rodden, J. (2003). Federalism and bailouts in Brazil. In Fiscal decentralization and the challenge of hard budget constraints. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/3021.003.0012

Secretaria do Tesouro Nacional (2018). Boletim de finanças dos entes subnacionais. Retrieved from: http://www.tesouro.fazenda.gov.br/-/tesouro-nacional-divulga-o-boletim-dos-entes-subnacionais-de-2018

Rossi, J. L., & Aguiar, F. (2018). Understanding the evolution of the fiscal situation of the Brazilian states; 2006–2015. EconomiA, 19(1), 105–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econ.2017.06.003

Published

18-05-2020

How to Cite

Reis, C. (2020). Bailout expectations and moral hazard in debt by subnational governments: empirical evidence from Brazil. CADERNOS DE FINANÇAS PÚBLICAS, 20(01). https://doi.org/10.55532/1806-8944.2020.53