Fiscal Rules and Government Efficiency: An Empirical Analysis from 1996 to 2020

Authors

  • Luis Felipe de Oliveira Silva Araujo Banco Interamericano de Desenvolvimento - BID
  • José Luiz Rossi Júnior Banco Interamericano de Desenvolvimento - BID

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55532/1806-8944.2024.231

Keywords:

Tax Rules, Fiscal Policy, Method of Generalized Moments

Abstract

The work investigates the effects of the main categories of fiscal rules (debt, revenue, expenses and results) on the economic aggregates that each one seeks to control. Using a dataset covering 180 countries from 1996 to 2020, the interaction between fiscal rules and government efficiency was experimented. To measure the impact of these rules, we use the generalized method of moments (GMM). The results indicate that the effect of the rule, through the debt rule, is associated with expenditure control and a greater fiscal result. Furthermore, although the rules prove to be substitutes for government efficiency in debt control and greater fiscal results, they also prove to be complementary in the case of expenditure.

References

ALESINA, A. et al. Budget institutions and fiscal performance in latin america. Journal of development Economics, Elsevier, v. 59, n. 2, p. 253–273, 1999.

ALT, J. E.; LOWRY, R. C. Divided government, fiscal institutions, and budget deficits: Evidence from the states. American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press,v. 88, n. 4, p. 811–828, 1994.

ARELLANO, M.; BOND, S. Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. The review of economic studies, Wiley-Blackwell, v. 58, n. 2, p. 277–297, 1991.

BADINGER, H.; REUTER, W. H. The case for fiscal rules. Economic Modelling, Elsevier,v. 60, p. 334–343, 2017.

BERGMAN, U. M.; HUTCHISON, M. M.; JENSEN, S. E. H. Promoting sustainable public finances in the european union: The role of fiscal rules and government efficiency. European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, v. 44, p. 1–19, 2016.

BLUNDELL, R.; BOND, S. Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of econometrics, Elsevier, v. 87, n. 1, p. 115–143, 1998.

BOHN, H.; INMAN, R. P. Balanced-budget rules and public deficits: evidence from the us states. In: ELSEVIER. Carnegie-Rochester conference series on public policy. [S.l.], 1996. v. 45, p. 13–76.

CASELLI, F.; REYNAUD, J. Do fiscal rules cause better fiscal balances? a new instrumental variable strategy. European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, v. 63, p. 101873, 2020.

CASELLI, F.; WINGENDER, P. Heterogeneous effects of fiscal rules: The maastricht fiscal criterion and the counterfactual distribution of government deficits. European Economic Review, Elsevier, v. 136, p. 103748, 2021.

DAVOODI, H. et al. Fiscal rules and fiscal councils: Recent trends and performance during the covid-19 pandemic. International Monetary Fund, 2022.

DEBRUN, X. et al. Tied to the mast? national fiscal rules in the european union. Economic Policy, Oxford University Press, v. 23, n. 54, p. 298–362, 2008.

EYRAUD, L. et al. Second-Generation Fiscal Rules: Balancing Simplicity, Flexibility, and Enforceability. [S.l.], 2018.

GREMBI, V.; NANNICINI, T.; TROIANO, U. Do fiscal rules matter? American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, JSTOR, p. 1–30, 2016.

GUERGUIL, M.; MANDON, P.; TAPSOBA, R. Flexible fiscal rules and countercyclical fiscal policy. Journal of Macroeconomics, Elsevier, v. 52, p. 189–220, 2017.

HEINEMANN, F.; MOESSINGER, M.-D.; YETER, M. Do fiscal rules constrain fiscal policy? a meta-regression-analysis. European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, v. 51,p. 69–92, 2018.

INMAN, R. P. Do balanced budget rules work? US experience and possible lessons for the EMU. [S.l.]: National bureau of economic research Cambridge, Mass., USA, 1996.

LLEDÓ, V. et al. Fiscal rules at a glance. International Monetary Fund, p. 2–77, 2017.

POTERBA, J. M. State responses to fiscal crises: The effects of budgetary institutions and politics. Journal of political Economy, The University of Chicago Press, v. 102, n. 4, p. 799–821, 1994.

ROGOFF, K. S. Equilibrium political budget cycles. [S.l.]: National Bureau of Economic Research Cambridge, Mass., USA, 1987.

ROODMAN, D. How to do xtabond2: An introduction to difference and system gmm in stata. The stata journal, SAGE Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA, v. 9, n. 1, p. 86–136, 2009.

ROODMAN, D. A note on the theme of too many instruments. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and statistics, Wiley Online Library, v. 71, n. 1, p. 135–158, 2009.

RULES, F. Anchoring expectations for sustainable public finance. IMF.–2009.– SM/09/274.–P, v. 4, 2009.

SCHAECHTER, M. A. et al. Fiscal Rules in Response to the Crisis: Toward the"Next-Generation"Rules: A New Dataset. [S.l.]: International Monetary Fund, 2012.

TORNELL, A.; LANE, P. R. The voracity effect. American economic review, American Economic Association, v. 89, n. 1, p. 22–46, 1999.

VALENCIA, O.; ULLOA-SUAREZ, C. Numerical Compliance with Fiscal Rules in Latin America and the Caribbean. [S.l.], 2022.

WINDMEIJER, F. A finite sample correction for the variance of linear efficient two-step gmm estimators. Journal of econometrics, Elsevier, v. 126, n. 1, p. 25–51, 2005.

Published

02-01-2024

How to Cite

de Oliveira Silva Araujo, L. F., & Rossi Júnior, J. L. (2024). Fiscal Rules and Government Efficiency: An Empirical Analysis from 1996 to 2020. CADERNOS DE FINANÇAS PÚBLICAS, 24(01). https://doi.org/10.55532/1806-8944.2024.231